RSS Feed

Starter Wife IV: Can We Rest Now, Buffy? Can We Just…Rest?

Posted on

I’m so tired.  So, so tired.  I want so much for it to end.  And it just won’t.  What started out as a promise of fun summer fluff has turned into I Claudius only with Ponds placements, crap looping, and an aching, gaping hole where sexy should be.

1)  Though he may be passionate and shirtless, Sam is also humorless.  I mean it: the writing and the performer have completely abandoned all hope of being funny.  It doesn’t help that Messing has scenes wherein she enacts brain freeze in the middle of Sam’s bittersweet confession about killing his BFF.  I don’t think anyone really has a grasp on funny, but with Sam, it’s painful.  I think that the few moments that make me laugh are either unintentional (please see Sam’s bittersweet confession, which I could’ve sworn was going to end with Sam saying, “It’s like the Chappaquiddick has it out for us rich, drunk white people”) or light, momentary, and fleeting, like the Silence of the Lambs parody last week.

Oh, and I laughed thinking that when Sam snapped at Joan that he needed a damn drink, Joan would reply, “Sorry, but we’re all out of fortified wine!”

2)  Joan and Molly’s segue from grooming Molly of hobo twigs and leaves to a serious discussion about Joan’s drinking problem?  Dude, I’ve seen afterschool specials that ground less gears.

3)  For the last time, who cares about that Vincent Gallo-looking motherhonker?  Does anyone believe the serious auteur dialogue they write for him?  Does anyone find it entertaining?

I will admit: one of the delightful believable moments was when he made a total douche of himself at dinner.  He’s totally the kind of guy who would make a grating “Let’s all try to live homeless for a day” declaration.

4)  Let’s get back to the whole Molly/Sam setup.  I get that she’s getting the best sex of her life.  I do.  I buy it.  Sure, sure.  But how are we supposed to believe that an earnest-yet-jaded lady like Molly, sex-deprived and earnest though she may be, would immediately jump from “good boning” to “I think I have a chance with this guy!”  Why, oh, why were we forced to endure the dinner scene at all?  Where has there been any indication that these two people are interested in each other beyond their lend-and-read Philip Roth book club and their rubbing up on each other and whatnot?

5) The one good thing about the series, Joe Mantegna’s Lou, was tarnished by the sloppy, lazy, grotesquely stupid memorial scene, that went on about five minutes too long, was dumb and crap, and involved Mantegna wearing lipstick.

Uh, this isn’t to say there weren’t AWESOME Mantegna moments.  Like him eating fries and watching National Geographic Channel.  Couldn’t we have hung out in that scene for seven minutes or so, watching Mantegna eat one fry at a time?  Or how about watching him do roadside cleanup on his hand-free, his adorable dark bangs brushing against his forehead?  What about the host of totally smokin’ hot pictures of a bearded Mantegna at the memorial?  Or that thing at the end where Molly goes to Lou’s house, and Lou hugs her from behind, and then Molly and Lou make gentle yet athletic love on the sparkling marble floor.

 Molly and Lou had sex.  You heard it hear.  I don’t care if the previews show some kind of poncey pissing match between Lou and Sam for Molly’s affection.  I don’t care if the voiceover proclaims that Molly has to choose between comfort and passion, thus telling any viewer with a pulse that we are supposed to be rooting for Molly/Sam.

 This is the only way I can justify having spent five hours of my life watching this miniseries.  Don’t crush my dream.  It’s such a fragile, impure, dirty thing.  *weeps with guilt and sad, sad, sad, sadness*

About jesshelga

Likes: The Office US, 30 Rock, Psych, Heroes (for the most part), any Lifetime Movie Network movies, Alton Brown, The Wire, Sopranos Dislikes: Anything I say here will sound snobby after putting LMN movies in my "Likes"...but Sex and the City and CSI

2 responses »

  1. So… let me get this straight. This guy who looked like Thomas Jane is…. homeless, buuuut just pretending to be homeless? I only ask this because… didn’t this already happen on Arrested Development? At least on that show, they could, you know, get the real Thomas Jane.

    MAN, not having the source material to watch is frustrating. Because I am all for hot dudes wearing nothing but jams, but this sounds pretty much hideous.

    Reply
  2. See, T., there are many layers to Jane Bot’s character. He’s a formerly rich a-hole (think James Spader in Pretty in Pink) who crashed his hot rod, which killed the passenger, his best friend (think Andrew McCarthy in Pretty in Pink; and oh, what a relief it would have been if a car accident had taken that character in the third act of PiP). Now, after doing five years hard time in Oswald Penitentiary, he continues his penance by living amongst the hobos, where bluebirds sing in cigarette trees and little streams of alkehol come a’tricklin’ down the rocks. And he does it all with the grating air of those people who are always certain to wedge the fact that they don’t stand in judgment of how you live your materialistic life, for he was once one of you, but you CAN TOTALLY FEEL HE IS JUDGING YOUR MATERIALISTIC LIFESTYLE.

    You couldn’t be more right: pretty much hideous. Not in a sloppy mediocre Lifetime movie way, but in some awkward new way.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: